🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed order, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that is projected to include as many as five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three decision, issued on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to overturn a district court's injunction that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disturbing the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in detailing its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the new maps. It had ordered the state to use the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissent

In a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's ruling. She stated that it undermined the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was crafted by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling comes amid a nationwide fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican control. Typically, boundary revision happens after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add several more Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures representation favorable to the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

In contrast, opposition party officials lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another leading House leader stated the court had another time shredded its standing by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.